Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Hankook (71%). Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Kinergy Eco K425 and the Efficient Grip Performance were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 55% of Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 has C wet grip rating, whereas 50% of Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance has A rating.
| # | Hankook Kinergy Eco K425
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | velmi dobré | 100 | 100 | 109 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 97,7 | dobrý | 97,5 | 97,9 | 95,5 | ||
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Rating: Very good | 98,7 | velmi dobré | 98,7 | 98,7 | 109 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | |
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,0 | |
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance Rating: Good | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 2,0 | 3,9 | 2,1 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
