Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Hankook (71%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 and Continental ContiPremiumContact 5, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Kinergy Eco K425 and the ContiPremiumContact 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 55% of Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 has B rating.
# | Hankook Kinergy Eco K425
| Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R15 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 100 | velmi dobré | 100 | 100 | 109 | ||
Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | 97,7 | dobrý | 97,5 | 97,9 | 95,5 | ||
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Very good | 100 | velmi dobré | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | |
Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,0 | |
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,3 | 1,6 | 2,0 | 3,4 | 2,0 | |
Show test details |