Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Hankook (71%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 and Bridgestone Turanza T001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 185/65 R15 test, where both the Kinergy Eco K425 and the Turanza T001 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 55% of Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 has C wet grip rating, whereas 72% of Bridgestone Turanza T001 has B rating.
| # | Hankook Kinergy Eco K425
| Bridgestone Turanza T001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | |
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,0 | |
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,0 | 1,6 | 2,0 | 1,7 | 1,7 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
