Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Premium
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Vredestein Quatrac
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Vredestein Quatrac
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Browsing for all-round tyres? Here are two notable options to consider: the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 and Vredestein Quatrac. Let's look at their strengths, weaknesses, and test results according to leading tyre experts like ADAC, TyreReviews.com and Auto Bild.
Starting with the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750, a successor to the well-regarded Hankook Kinergy 4S. This South Korea-made tyre received 89% rating from us. In the ADAC test, it reached a notable third place out of 16 tyres. Reviewers from TyreReviews.com praised its precise and safe properties on dry roads, high mileage forecasts, low wear, and low fuel consumption. However, it displayed slight weaknesses on wet and wintry roads, and its rolling noise was on the higher side.
The Vredestein Quatrac, manufactured in Hungary, scored 88% in our rating. This tyre achieved sixth place in the ADAC test, showing its solid performance. Reviewers noted positives like high predicted mileage, low wear, and good efficiency. Yet, it showed weaknesses on dry roads and slight weaknesses on wet and wintry roads.
When compared directly, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 typically outperformed Vredestein Quatrac in dry conditions, braking and handling, but fell short in aquaplaning resistance and snow performance. On the other side, the Vredestein Quatrac showed better performance on wet and snowy roads, despite having higher than average rolling resistance. In the Auto Bild testing, Vredestein Quatrac featured among the best in wet braking and handling, while Hankook excelled in aquaplaning and snow handling.
Summarizing the comparison data; the Hankook provides superior results on dry surfaces and fuel consumption, whereas Vredestein shines during wet and snowy conditions, albeit at the cost of slightly higher fuel consumption. Both tyres offer a good balance between performance, durability and safety.
Undoubtedly, choosing between the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 and the Vredestein Quatrac depends on your unique requirements and driving conditions. But either way, you'll be getting a reliable, high-quality product from reputable Hankook and Vredestein manufacturers.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 5.4 | velmi dobré | 1.8 | 2.3 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2.7 | dobré | 2.2 | 2.9 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Good | 2.8 | dobré | 2.2 | 3.1 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | ||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Highly recommended | vysoce doporučeno | ||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41.3 | 49.5 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.3 | 45.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 42,1 | 48 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 41,7 | 47,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 3+ | ||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | dobré | 1 | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | ||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1 | 1- | 2 | 1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41,1 | 47,2 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40,6 | 46,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
