Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When comparing the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 and the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S tyres, both products stand out for their distinct features and performance qualities. Considering tests results, the Hankook Kinergy is known for its significant strengths such as excellent performance in snow handling, dry handling, and reduced exterior noise, which gave it a remarkable third position in Autobild’s test out of 32 tyres.
Meanwhile, the Kumho HA32, made in China whereas the Hankook model is made in Korea, also offered commendable results. It showed strengths in areas such as effective snow braking, mileage and price/value ratio, enabling it to secure the tenth spot in the same test.
The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 delivered excellent handling properties in all weather conditions, making it a reliable all-year-round tyre. Its major strengths cited in test summaries across 2020-2023 include short snow and wet braking distance, dynamic handling qualities, and a considerable level of comfort. However, it did show drawbacks in the form of extended wet and dry braking distances, and an average mileage and efficiency rating.
On the other hand, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S displayed an excellent performance in snow traction and a secure handling in both wet and dry conditions. It maintained low noise levels, providing a quieter ride, and also boasted of a high mileage and overall efficiency. Drawbacks for the HA32 Solus 4S include moderate aquaplaning reserves, extended wet and dry braking distances, and a high rolling resistance.
Made in Korea, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 also has a higher rating at 84% compared to the 73% rating of the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S. The Kinergy 4S2 H750 is a successor to the previously popular Hankook Kinergy 4S, while the Kumho model doesn't have any predecessor.
In conclusion, in terms of overall test results, handling, and customer satisfaction, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 performs slightly better than the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S. Nonetheless, both models offer substantial benefits to their users and can be chosen based on individual needs and preferences.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41.3 | 49.5 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41.4 | 49.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 42,1 | 48 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,4 | 51,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 1- | 3+ | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 40,3 | 52,3 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41,5 | 54,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Exemplary | 1 | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Good | 1 | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 41,1 | 47,2 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,3 | 49,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
