Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy 4S H740 vs. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Falken (65%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 73% of Hankook Kinergy 4S H740 has C wet grip rating, whereas 57% of Falken Azenis FK510 SUV has A rating.
| # | Hankook Kinergy 4S H740
| Falken Azenis FK510 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Very good -
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 SUV Recommended
