Segment
1. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 Premium2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Hankook (71%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 and Michelin Latitude Tour HP, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Michelin Latitude Tour HP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Dynapro HP2 RA33 and the Latitude Tour HP were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 74% of Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 has B wet grip rating, whereas 69% of Michelin Latitude Tour HP has C rating.
# | Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33
| Michelin Latitude Tour HP
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 Premium2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Premium
2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Conditionally recommended
2. Michelin Latitude Tour HP Sufficient
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | chvalitebné | 2,0 | 1,6 | 0,5 | 2,8 | 1,5 | |
Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 Rating: Good | dobré | 3,3 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,9 | |
Michelin Latitude Tour HP Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,9 | 2,3 | 0,5 | 3,1 | 1,9 | |
Show test details |