Comparison: GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, Apollo winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than GT (37%). But when it comes to comparing GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo and Apollo Alnac 4G Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Radial Winter Pro 2 evo and the Alnac 4G Winter were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 3 | 3+ | 3 | ||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter | 36.4 | 30.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
