Segment
1. GT radial Sport Active 2 Lowcost2. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Lowcost
# | GT radial Sport Active 2
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R17 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today's comparison will focus on the GT radial Sport Active 2 and the Maxxis Victra Sport 5. Both tyres belong to the popular summer tyres category with the latter possessing an additional UHP (ultra-high performance) subtype. The GT model came out with a rating of 44%, while the Maxxis tyre scored a higher 69% on our scale.
The GT radial Sport Active 2, according to the tests, performed fairly well in aquaplaning and demonstrated secure and easily controllable cornering behavior on dry roads. However, it registered the longest braking distances on both wet and dry asphalt and had less driving stability in wet corners. This tyre's limitations suggest that it might be better suited for lighter, less powerful vehicles.
On the other hand, the Maxxis Victra Sport 5, despite its weak wet braking performance, showed surprisingly good adhesion and dynamic steering response in wet bends. However, its key weaknesses included a lack of steering precision in dry corners, deficiencies in wet braking and aquaplaning protection, and a rather uncomfortable ride due to poor self-damping.
Looking into the specific test positions, we find some interesting results. In the Autobild test, where 50 tyres were assessed, the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 stood 9th, while the GT radial Sport Active 2 finished 15th. An even closer competition was observed in the AutoMotorSport test, where the GT Radial Sport Active 2 claimed 10th place out of 10, just one point behind the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 which finished 9th. GT Radial's best features included cross aquaplaning and exterior noise, while Maxxis excelled in wet handling and wet side guidance.
In conclusion, the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 seems to have an overall edge in terms of performance rating and test positions. It might be suitable for drivers expecting stronger performance, specifically good wet cornering grip and dynamic steering, despite some comfort compromises. The GT Radial Sport Active 2, while not as high-performing as the Maxxis, could be fitting for motorists prioritizing aquaplaning resistance and quieter driving, but who are willing to be careful around wet and dry braking.
Remember, neither of the tyres has been replaced with newer models, ensuring that the ratings and conclusions drawn remain undiluted and unbiased.
1. GT radial Sport Active 2 Lowcost2. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Lowcost
1. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Highly recommended
1. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Conditionally recommended2. GT radial Sport Active 2 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
GT Radial Sport Active 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | ||||
Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2 | 3+ | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
Gt Radial Sport Active 2 | 63.3 | 27.3 | |||||
Maxxis Victra Sport 5 | 60.8 | 26.7 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,0 | 9,7 | 9,4 | ||||
GT radial Sport Active 2 Rating: Sufficient | 6,7 | 7,0 | 7,2 | ||||
Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 7,0 | 7,6 | 7,6 | ||||
Show test details |