Comparison: Gt Radial Fe2 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2
Table of contents:
| # | Gt Radial Fe2
| Fulda EcoControl HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | Not available in 265/60 R18 (change) | Not available in 265/60 R18 (change) | |
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When it comes to tyres, two of the models that caught our attention are the GT Radial Fe2 and Fulda EcoControl HP2. In our review, the former didn't receive a rating, whereas the latter got a score of 71%. Let's delve into the gritty details of these tyres manufactured by GT Radial and Fulda, respectively.
Let's begin with the GT Radial Fe2. While it doesn't have any previous models or any new tyre replacing it, the tyre is categorised as an ultra-high-performance (UHP) type. When it was tested by Autobild, it secured the 19th position out of 55 tyres, and the 22nd in an ADAC test comprising of 50 tyres. The GT Radial Fe2 was praised for its secure aquaplaning qualities, short dry braking distances, and particularly for its cost-effectiveness. However, critiques included average grip on both wet and dry surfaces.
On the other hand, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 is a summer tyre that replaced the EcoControl HP model. When pitted against others in the Autobild test, it ascended to the 16th position, hence outperforming the GT Radial Fe2. In the ADAC test too, it surpassed the latter by securing the 13th position. The tyre stood out for its low exterior noise. It was also marked as 'good' for environmental balance, lifespan, abrasion, and efficiency. However, a slight setback was its not-so-impressive wet road performance.
To conclude, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 seems to have a slight edge over the GT Radial Fe2 based on aggregate test results. While the former flexes its muscles with better environmental performance and lower exterior noise, the latter puts up a fight with superior dry-road performance and a more economic price tag. Both have their strengths and areas for potential improvement, boiling down to personal preferences and specific requirements of users.
We recommend prospective buyers to dig deeper into the features of both the tyres before making a purchase. Visit the respective links for GT Radial Fe2 and Fulda EcoControl HP2 for a detailed overview and make an informed decision.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Gt Radial Fe2 68%
Wet braking
1. Gt Radial Fe2 69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Gt Radial Fe2 73%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
2. Gt Radial Fe2 74%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Gt Radial Fe2 73%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Gt Radial Fe2 72%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 | 37,4 | 29,3 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,8 | 29,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Gt Radial Fe2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,9 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
