Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than GT (37%). But when it comes to comparing GT Radial Champiro WinterPro and Nokian WR D4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of GT Radial Champiro WinterPro was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR D4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the Radial Champiro WinterPro and the WR D4 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | GT Radial Champiro WinterPro
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R16 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Lowcost
2. Nokian WR D4 14.
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 9,8 | 9,3 | 9,5 | 9,1 | ||
GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Rating: Still recommended | částečně doporučeno | 7,3 | 7,5 | 7,7 | 7,9 | ||
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 9,0 | 9,3 | 8,7 | 8,0 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 412 | velmi doporučeno | 142 | 127 | 143 | 25 | 10 |
GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Rating: Conditionally recommended | 305 | podmíněně doporučeno | 95 | 108 | 102 | 14 | 10 |
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Highly recommended | 387 | velmi doporučeno | 124 | 121 | 142 | 21 | 8 |
Show test details |