Segment
2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Lowcost
Comparison: GT Radial Champiro WinterPro vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than GT (37%). But when it comes to comparing GT Radial Champiro WinterPro and Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the Radial Champiro WinterPro and the Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 were tested.
| # | GT Radial Champiro WinterPro
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R16 | R16 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Recommended2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Conditionally recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Still recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 9,8 | 9,3 | 9,5 | 9,1 | ||
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Rating: Still recommended | částečně doporučeno | 7,3 | 7,5 | 7,7 | 7,9 | ||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Rating: Still recommended | částečně doporučeno | 7,4 | 8,0 | 8,5 | 7,3 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
