Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than GT (37%). But when it comes to comparing GT Radial Champiro WinterPro and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of GT Radial Champiro WinterPro was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the Radial Champiro WinterPro and the Blizzak LM-80 Evo were tested.
# | GT Radial Champiro WinterPro
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R16 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Premium2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Lowcost
1. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Conditionally recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
1. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Conditionally recommended2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 9,8 | 9,3 | 9,5 | 9,1 | ||
GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Rating: Still recommended | částečně doporučeno | 7,3 | 7,5 | 7,7 | 7,9 | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo Rating: Still recommended | částečně doporučeno | 5,7 | 7,9 | 9,5 | 7,9 | ||
Show test details |