Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Lowcost
Comparison: GT Radial Champiro WinterPro vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than GT (37%). But when it comes to comparing GT Radial Champiro WinterPro and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of GT Radial Champiro WinterPro was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the GTÜ 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Radial Champiro WinterPro and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested.
| # | GT Radial Champiro WinterPro
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R16 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 412 | velmi doporučeno | 142 | 127 | 143 | 25 | 10 |
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro Rating: Conditionally recommended | 305 | podmíněně doporučeno | 95 | 108 | 102 | 14 | 10 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: Recommended | 341 | doporučeno | 100 | 114 | 127 | 19 | 8 |
| Show test details | |||||||
