Segment
2. Viking WinTech Lowcost
Comparison: GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP vs. Viking WinTech
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking). Generally, Viking winter tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than GT (37%). In this particular case, the Viking WinTech has a better rating of 58% compared to 49% of the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP. The first tyre test of GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Viking WinTech first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Radial Champiro WinterPro HP and the WinTech were tested.
| # | GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP
| Viking WinTech
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Viking WinTech 22.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Viking WinTech Recommended2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Ice
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP | 36,2 | 31,6 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 36,0 | 31,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
