Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP vs. Kumho WinterCraft WS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (48%) than GT (38%). In this particular case, the GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP has a better rating of 59% compared to 37% of the Kumho WinterCraft WS71. The first tyre test of GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WS71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Offroad 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the Radial Champiro WinterPro HP and the WinterCraft WS71 were tested.
| # | GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP | Kumho WinterCraft WS71 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Satisfactory2. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Rating: Satisfactory | 3- | 2- | 2- | 1- | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 4 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||