Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium2. GT Radial Champiro HPY Lowcost
Comparison: GT Radial Champiro HPY vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein summer tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than GT (51%). But when it comes to comparing GT Radial Champiro HPY and Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of GT Radial Champiro HPY was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the Radial Champiro HPY and the Ultrac Vorti were tested.
| # | GT Radial Champiro HPY
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R17 - R24 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. GT Radial Champiro HPY Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. GT Radial Champiro HPY Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| GT Radial Champiro HPY Rating: Satisfactory | 3,2 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 3,2 | 2,0 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,3 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
