Segment
1. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Lowcost2. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
Comparison: GT Radial Champiro FE1 vs. Apollo Alnac 4G
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo). Generally, GT summer tyres are slightly better rated (51%) than Apollo (43%). The first tyre test of GT Radial Champiro FE1 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Apollo Alnac 4G first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Radial Champiro FE1 and the Alnac 4G were tested.
| # | GT Radial Champiro FE1
| Apollo Alnac 4G
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary2. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory2. GT Radial Champiro FE1 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| GT Radial Champiro FE1 | 38,0 | 36,5 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
