Segment
1. GT Radial 4Seasons Lowcost2. Viking Fourtech Lowcost
Comparison: GT Radial 4Seasons vs. Viking Fourtech
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking). Generally, Viking allround tyres are slightly better rated (45%) than GT (10%). In this particular case, the Viking Fourtech has a better rating of 45% compared to 10% of the GT Radial 4Seasons. The first tyre test of GT Radial 4Seasons was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Viking Fourtech first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the Radial 4Seasons and the Fourtech were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | GT Radial 4Seasons
| Viking Fourtech
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. GT Radial 4Seasons 25.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Viking Fourtech Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| GT Radial 4Seasons | 45,3 | 58,2 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 43,5 | 52,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| GT Radial 4Seasons | 46,5 | 60,3 | |||||
| Viking Fourtech | 46 | 53,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
