Segment
2. Nokian Weatherproof SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2 vs. Nokian Weatherproof SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Goodyear allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2 and Nokian Weatherproof SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Nokian Weatherproof SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2 and the Weatherproof SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Nokian Weatherproof SUV has A rating. We also know where Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2 is made - Slovakia.
| # | Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2
| Nokian Weatherproof SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-2 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Nokian Weatherproof SUV Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
