Segment
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (86%) than Nokian (52%). The first tyre test of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR SUV 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 255/55 R18 test, where both the UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 and the WR SUV 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 78% of Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 has B wet grip rating, whereas 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C rating.
# | Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended
1. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Recommended
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | Příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance SUV Gen-1 Rating: - | Příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 2 | |||
Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: - | Dostatečné | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |||
Show test details |