In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Hankook (71%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has a better rating of 88% compared to 51% of the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320. The first tyre test of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the UltraGrip Performance+ and the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 82% of GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has B wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 has C rating.
# | GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2+ | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 8,9 | ||||||
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Rating: Very good | 8,9 | ||||||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Good | 7,6 | ||||||
Show test details |