Segment
2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle
Comparison: GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Table of contents:
| # | GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Two top choices in the summer tyres category are the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and the Firestone Roadhawk. Both products come from reputable manufacturers, with GoodYear and Firestone providing reliability and performance to vehicle owners.
The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 succeeds the popular Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, upping the ante in performance. Manufactured in Slovenia and Germany, this tyre has received an impressive rating of 90% from our team. Notably, it topped the test out of 53 compared tyres in Autobild, a leading auto publication. Its strengths lie in its excellent value for price, exceptional handling in wet conditions, impressive aquaplaning resistance and high mileage. The tyre's superior qualities lend to an exemplary drive experience, particularly appreciated by drivers frequenting wet terrains. However, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 has already been replaced by a newer model, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk, holding a decent rating of 72% from us, provides a more affordable summer tyre option without forgoing quality. Although it doesn't come with a preceding model, its performance has stood the test, landing at the 13th spot in the Autobild test of 53 tyres. Specific strengths or weaknesses aren't highlighted in the test, but its position reflects a commendable performance in its category. There isn't a newer model replacing the Firestone Roadhawk as of now.
In conclusion, while both tyres exhibit their own strengths, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 outperforms the Firestone Roadhawk overall in terms of handling, resistance and mileage, making it a superior choice evidently. Nevertheless, the Firestone Roadhawk is a viable choice for those seeking a balance of cost-efficiency and reliable performance.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | 1 | |||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | 33,2 | 30,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 34,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | 34,7 | 28,8 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 32 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
