In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Kumho (60%). The first tyre test of Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS91 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the SportAuto 2017 225/40 R18 test, where both the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 and the Ecsta PS91 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (70%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS91 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 is made in Germany and Ecsta PS91 is made in Korea.
# | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
| Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R18 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 9,5 | 9,5 | 9,4 | ||||
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Recommended | 8,6 | 9,1 | 9,4 | ||||
Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,3 | 8,4 | 5,9 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | |||||
Show test details |