Segment
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Goodride SW612 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Goodride (14%). But when it comes to comparing Goodride SW612 and Continental VanContact Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Goodride SW612 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Continental VanContact Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the SW612 and the VanContact Winter were tested.
# | Goodride SW612
| Continental VanContact Winter
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R12 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Goodride SW612 Lowcost
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Goodride SW612 Rating: Not recommended | nedoporučeno | 3,1 | 3,6 | 4,9 | 2,3 | 3,4 | 3,0 | 1,6 |
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
Show test details |