Segment
1. Goodride SW601 Lowcost2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride SW601 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Matador winter tyres are slightly better rated (38%) than Goodride (14%). The first tyre test of Goodride SW601 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Matador MP92 Sibir Snow first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the SW601 and the MP92 Sibir Snow were tested.
| # | Goodride SW601
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R15 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Goodride SW601 | 38,5 | 29,2 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 40,6 | 26,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
