Segment
2. Gislaved euro Frost 6 Lowcost
Comparison: Gislaved euro Frost 6 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Sweden (Gislaved) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Gislaved is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Gislaved (21%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has a better rating of 72% compared to 21% of the Gislaved euro Frost 6. The first tyre test of Gislaved euro Frost 6 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the euro Frost 6 and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Gislaved euro Frost 6
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Gislaved euro Frost 6 23.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Gislaved euro Frost 6 Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory2. Gislaved euro Frost 6 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 1,8 | 2,1 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
| Gislaved euro Frost 6 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 3,2 | 2,8 | 2,7 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,5 | 1,9 |
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2,1 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Gislaved euro Frost 6 | 35,1 | - | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 32 | 24,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Gislaved euro Frost 6 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2 | 1- | 1- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Gislaved euro Frost 6 | 37 | 28,1 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 34,9 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
