Segment
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2
Table of contents:
| # | Fulda SportControl 2 | Sava Intensa UHP 2 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this comparison, we are looking at two summer tyres: the Fulda SportControl 2 and the Sava Intensa UHP 2. Both tyres have been tested in various conditions and have shown their strengths and weaknesses.
The Fulda SportControl 2 is a tyre with a rating of 84%, promising good performance and solid reviews. In the Autobild test, where it competed against 52 other tyres, the SportControl 2 secured the 9th position. It was praised for its exterior noise, comfort, rolling resistance, and aquaplaning resistance. However, it faced some criticism for its delayed steering response and mediocre tread life. In the ACE test, the tyre took the 3rd spot, boasting impressive features like dry handling, wet braking, wet circle cornering, and wet handling.
On the other hand, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 is a successor to the Sava Intensa UHP and has a rating of 76%. It secured the 11th spot in the Autobild test, where it competed against 52 tyres. The tyre was applauded for its great aquaplaning resistance and good price-to-value ratio. In the ACE test, the Intensa UHP 2 took the 2nd spot, with remarkable features like dry handling, exterior noise reduction, wet circle cornering, and wet handling.
When comparing the two tyres head-to-head, the Fulda SportControl 2 seems to be slightly better in terms of overall performance, taking into account its impressive positions in both the Autobild and ACE tests. However, if you are looking for a tyre with good value-for-money, you might want to consider the Sava Intensa UHP 2 as it offers strong competition at a more attractive price point.
Both Fulda and Sava are well-established tyre manufacturers, and choosing between their tyres ultimately depends on your requirements and preferences. With this comparison, we hope to have provided some valuable insights into these summer tyres to help you make an informed decision.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 11.31
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda SportControl 2 70 dB2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 72 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 63.9 | 29 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36,5 | 29,4 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 36,3 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 61 | 56 | 20 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Recommended | 61 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 12 | ||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Recommended | 56 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 18 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 34,2 | 31,7 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 34,7 | 35,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 32 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 37,9 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35,3 | 38,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||