Segment
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Nokian (58%). In this particular case, the Fulda SportControl 2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 37% of the Nokian zLine. The first tyre test of Fulda SportControl 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian zLine first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the SportControl 2 and the zLine were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Fulda SportControl 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian zLine also have A wet ratings.
# | Fulda SportControl 2 | Nokian zLine | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian zLine Upper-middle2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
2. Nokian zLine 20.
1. Nokian zLine 7.38
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Nokian zLine Recommended
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory
1. Nokian zLine 83%
1. Nokian zLine 85%
2. Nokian zLine 75%
2. Nokian zLine 60%
1. Nokian zLine 90%
2. Nokian zLine 75%
1. Fulda SportControl 2 70 dB2. Nokian zLine ? dB
1. Nokian zLine 93%
1. Nokian zLine 85%
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
Fulda SportControl 2 | 35,1 | 37,9 | |||||
Nokian zLine | 36,1 | 40,2 | |||||
Show test details |