Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Fulda (42%). Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2015 185/65 R15 test, where both the Kristall Montero 3 and the WR D4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B rating.
# | Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Nokian WR D4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
1. Nokian WR D4 81%
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
2. Nokian WR D4 89%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 91%
1. Nokian WR D4 70%
1. Nokian WR D4 69%
1. Nokian WR D4 73%
1. Nokian WR D4 85%
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 415 | velmi doporučeno | 144 | 136 | 144 | ||
Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: - | 317 | 93 | 98 | 126 | |||
Nokian WR D4 Rating: Highly recommended | 399 | velmi doporučeno | 127 | 136 | 136 | ||
Show test details |