Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Montero 3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (42%) than Kumho (38%). In this particular case, the Fulda Kristall Montero 3 has a better rating of 24% compared to 20% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2015 185/65 R15 test, where both the Kristall Montero 3 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 415 | velmi doporučeno | 144 | 136 | 144 | ||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: - | 317 | 93 | 98 | 126 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: - | 338 | 107 | 111 | 120 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 42,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 42,5 | 30,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||