Segment
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Montero 3 vs. Kormoran SNOW
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (42%) than Kormoran (14%). In this particular case, the Fulda Kristall Montero 3 has a better rating of 24% compared to 6% of the Kormoran SNOW. The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Kormoran SNOW first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kormoran SNOW also have C wet ratings.
| # | Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Kormoran SNOW
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 16.
Worst position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 38.
Average position in tests
2. Kormoran SNOW 30.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
