Segment
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (42%) than Kormoran (14%). In this particular case, the Fulda Kristall Montero 3 has a better rating of 24% compared to 6% of the Kormoran SNOW. The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Kormoran SNOW first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kormoran SNOW also have C wet ratings.
# | Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Kormoran SNOW
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R15 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
2. Kormoran SNOW 16.
2. Kormoran SNOW 38.
2. Kormoran SNOW 30.33
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient