Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Fulda (42%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Kristall Montero 3 and the Winterhawk 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (92%) of the Firestone Winterhawk 3 also have C wet ratings.
# | Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 42,8 | 27,7 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 41,9 | 28,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 415 | velmi doporučeno | 144 | 136 | 144 | ||
Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: - | 317 | 93 | 98 | 126 | |||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: - | 338 | 100 | 112 | 136 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
Show test details |