Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Fulda (42%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Kristall Montero 3 and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 70% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 has B rating.
# | Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 42,8 | 27,7 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||
Show test details |