Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Montero 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Fulda (42%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Kristall Montero 3 and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 70% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 has B rating.
| # | Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 42,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
