Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Control SUV Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Fulda (42%). The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Control SUV was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Kristall Control SUV and the WR Snowproof were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 85% of Fulda Kristall Control SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof also have B wet ratings.
# | Fulda Kristall Control SUV
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Control SUV Lowcost
2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,5 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 0,8 | 1,8 |
Fulda Kristall Control SUV Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 3,1 | 2,6 | 2,4 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,7 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,1 |
Show test details |