Segment
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost2. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Debica Frigo HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Debica winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Fulda (42%). In this particular case, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 has a better rating of 59% compared to 57% of the Debica Frigo HP2. The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was done in 2017, compared to 2018 when was the Debica Frigo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the Kristall Control HP2 and the Frigo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Fulda Kristall Control HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (65%) of the Debica Frigo HP2 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Fulda Kristall Control HP2
| Debica Frigo HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Debica Frigo HP2 16.13
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Debica Frigo HP2 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory2. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 37,4 | 30,7 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,0 | 30,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,1 | 26,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 1- | ||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||
| Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2+ | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 33,5 | 24,3 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 34,2 | 24,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2 | 2- | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 34,8 | 27,6 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 36,6 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||