Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Control HP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Fulda (42%). But when it comes to comparing Fulda Kristall Control HP and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Control HP was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Kristall Control HP and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Fulda Kristall Control HP dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (70%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 also have B wet ratings.
# | Fulda Kristall Control HP
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Control HP Lowcost
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | Příkladné | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | ||
Fulda Kristall Control HP Rating: - | Podmíněně doporučeno | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | Dostatečné | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
Fulda Kristall Control HP | 38,9 | 26,4 | |||||
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
Show test details |