Segment
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Fulda (42%). But when it comes to comparing Fulda Kristall Control HP and Barum Polaris 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Control HP was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Barum Polaris 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Kristall Control HP and the Polaris 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Fulda Kristall Control HP has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Barum Polaris 3 has C rating.
# | Fulda Kristall Control HP
| Barum Polaris 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R13 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
1. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary
1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | Příkladné | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | ||
Fulda Kristall Control HP Rating: - | Podmíněně doporučeno | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2- | ||
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: - | Dostatečné | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
Fulda Kristall Control HP | 38,9 | 26,4 | |||||
Barum Polaris 3 | 37,2 | 26,1 | |||||
Show test details |