Segment
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Laufenn (58%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the EcoControl HP2 and the S Fit EQ+ LK01 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Fulda EcoControl HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (97%) of the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP2
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,8 | |||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Rating: Sufficient | 3,9 | 2,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
