Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Table of contents:
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP2
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R16 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
If you are in the market for summer tyres, two models may have caught your attention: the Fulda EcoControl HP2 and the Hankook Ventus Prime 4. Both cater to different needs and offer unique performance characteristics but how do they really stack up against each other?
The Fulda EcoControl HP2, a successor to the Fulda EcoControl HP, scores a 71% rating in our tests. Its best features include exceptional exterior noise performance. It excels in terms of mileage and is marked notably for its wear resistance and efficiency, according to Autobild 2024's tests. However, it doesn’t perform quite as well on wet surfaces which is something to consider if you often drive in rainy conditions.
On the other hand, we have the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 tyre. This model represents an upgrade from the previous Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 and achieves an impressive 81% in our evaluations. This tyre performs well both on dry and wet surfaces but has slight weaknesses in aquaplaning. It doesn't have the best performance in terms of fuel efficiency and has some impact on the environment. That said, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 clearly outperforms the Fulda EcoControl HP2 overall, securing 4th place in the Autobild and 9th in ADAC's tests, compared to the latter's 16th and 13th positions respectively.
Both tyres offer reliable performance for summer conditions but vary in their individual strengths and weaknesses. The Fulda EcoControl HP2 is a solid choice if noise control and tread life are your main concerns. However, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 offers a more balanced performance overall, despite having slight weaknesses when it comes to aquaplaning and environmental impact.
Before making a decision, it is essential to consider your personal driving style, typical driving conditions and personal preferences. More information on these models can be found at the manufacturers' websites - Fulda and Hankook.
In conclusion, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is generally better in tests overall and may serve as a more versatile option, although the Fulda EcoControl HP2 could still be a strong contender for those valuing exterior noise performance and tyre longevity.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,8 | 29,5 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 35,9 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,8 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Good | 2,7 | 2,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
