Segment
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost2. Debica Presto HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. Debica Presto HP2
Table of contents:
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP2
| Debica Presto HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Fulda EcoControl HP2 and Debica Presto HP2 are both summer tyres, designed for optimal performance in warm weather. Tested and rated by tyre test experts, these tyres have shown noteworthy strengths and weaknesses in various categories.
The EcoControl HP2 is a successor to the Fulda EcoControl HP tyre. It has been enhanced to offer better performance with our rating standing at 79%. According to the Autobild test, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 excelled in exterior noise reduction and cross Aquaplaning, managing to secure the 20th position out of 53 tyres tested. However, the test summary from autobild 2024 suggests that it demonstrated a few areas of concern including weaknesses on wet surfaces.
The Debica Presto HP2, on the other hand, doesn't have any previous model and its rated at a slightly higher percentage of 84%. It scored better in the Autobild test achieving the 16th position out of 53 tyres examined. This tyre stood out in price/value category. Autobild 2024 test summary indicates that the Debica Presto HP2 had weak points in terms of driving safety.
When comparing the positions of both tyres in the ADAC test, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 secured the 13th out of 50, while Debica Presto HP2 secured the 15th position.
In conclusion, the Debica Presto HP2 outperforms the Fulda EcoControl HP2 in terms of price/value and our rating. However, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 proves to be quieter and better in combating Aquaplaning. For more detailed review and features of these tyres, visit the respective manufacturers' websites at Fulda and Debica.
Ultimately, the best tyre would depend on individual driving needs. Drivers who prioritize low noise and aquaplaning resistance would be more inclined towards the Fulda EcoControl HP2 whereas those who value efficiency and good return on investment might choose Debica Presto HP2.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.752. Debica Presto HP2 12.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Debica Presto HP2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory2. Debica Presto HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB2. Debica Presto HP2 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,8 | 29,5 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 37,4 | 30,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,2 | 2,8 | ||||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Debica Presto HP2 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,0 | 33,8 | |||||
| Debica Presto HP2 | 36,3 | 31,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
