Segment
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage
Table of contents:
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP2
| BFGoodrich Advantage
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
We are here to compare two top-rated summer tyres, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 and the BFGoodrich Advantage, considering their overall performance, strengths, and weaknesses in various authoritative tyre tests. Let's explore these models in detail.
Fulda EcoControl HP2, a successor model to Fulda EcoControl HP, is a summer tyre made by Fulda. It boasts an average rating of 79%, earning particularly high marks in exterior noise reduction and aquaplaning. The model exhibited an excellent environmental score, good mileage, and efficient wear and tear in the Autobild 2024 test. However, the same test pointed out the tyre's relatively unbalanced performance and some weaknesses on wet surfaces.
On the other hand, BFGoodrich Advantage, produced by BFGoodrich, scores a respectable 76% in our rating. It shines in comfort another significant factor, dry handling. This summer tyre stood out due to its dynamic dry handling, quiet rolling noise, low rolling resistance, and competitive pricing, according to the Autobild 2024 test. Despite these strengths, it shows a slight tendency to understeer in wet conditions.
In mutual test positions, both tyres showed consistent performances. In the Autobild test with 53 tyre participants, the BFGoodrich Advantage ranked 18th, slightly ahead of the Fulda EcoControl HP2 at 20th. However, in the ADAC test involving 15 tyres, the Fulda model outdid the BFGoodrich tyre, occupying the 8th position compared to the latter's 9th.
In conclusion, the Fulda EcoControl HP2 stands out in noise reduction and resistance to aquaplaning, showing an overall balanced performance amidst slight weaknesses. In comparison, the BFGoodrich Advantage emerges as a strong contender with superior comfort, dry handling, and fuel efficiency. However, it exhibits a slight propensity to understeer under wet conditions. Therefore, the choice between the two ultimately depends on the conditions they will be used in and their specific strengths that cater to dedicated user needs.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 12.752. BFGoodrich Advantage 12.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 Satisfactory2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Fulda EcoControl HP2 70 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,8 | 29,5 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 37,4 | 29,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,2 | 2,8 | ||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 2,8 | 2,9 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 1,6 | 2,7 | 1 | 1,7 | |
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,1 | 2,7 | 3,2 | 1,0 | 2,2 | |
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,0 | 2,9 | 3,2 | 2,5 | 2,1 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 | 36,0 | 33,8 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 36,7 | 31,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | ||
| Fulda EcoControl HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 | ||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
