Segment
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Nokian WetProof
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Nokian (66%). The first tyre test of Fulda EcoControl HP was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Fulda EcoControl HP has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WetProof has A rating.
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP
| Nokian WetProof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Nokian WetProof Recommended
