Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda EcoControl HP vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Table of contents:
| # | Fulda EcoControl HP
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Fulda EcoControl HP is a type of summer tyre meant mainly for long-distance trips, offering a reasonable performance in terms of mileage and price/value ratio. According to data from Autobild test where it was ranked 17th out of 51 tyres, its best features are both mileage and price/value ratio. On ADAC test, it achieved 10th position out of 16 tyres. Although not the best, its performance is commendable. Our rating for this tyre is, however, at 0%.
The Fulda EcoControl HP was later replaced by a new model Fulda EcoControl HP2. And if you want to know more about this manufacturer visit its page here.
In comparison, the Firestone Roadhawk is another summer tyre to consider. As per the tests conducted by Autobild and ADAC, it showed a stronger performance. Scoring 3rd position out of 51 tyres in the Autobild test and 4th position out of 16 tyres in the ADAC test, the Roadhawk is evidently superior to the Fulda EcoControl HP. Our rating for this tyre stands at a commendable 59%.
Despite being a summer tyre, the Firestone Roadhawk has not been replaced by a newer model. Here is a link to the page of Firestone, the manufacturer of the Roadhawk tyre.
Summary
From the provided data, it is clear that the Firestone Roadhawk has an upper hand in terms of test performance when compared to the Fulda EcoControl HP. Its high ranking in both Autobild and ADAC tests is a clear testament to its quality, build, and performance. As per the information provided, it is safe to conclude that the Firestone Roadhawk may be a better choice for those looking for a reliable and higher performing summer tyre.
On the other hand, the Fulda EcoControl HP also shows reasonable performance especially in terms of mileage, price/value ratio, and it might be a good choice for those who prefer long-distance journeys. It is important to note that the Fulda EcoControl HP was replaced by the Fulda EcoControl HP2 which might offer better performance.
Verdict
From the mutual test positions, it's clear that the Firestone Roadhawk outperforms the Fulda EcoControl HP, offering better all-round performance and value for money according to our tests. While the Fulda EcoControl HP may offer benefits in respect to mileage, it is unable to compete with the performance offered by the Firestone Roadhawk.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP | 37 | 39,6 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,2 | 36,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | |
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,9 | 2,6 | 3,4 | 1,5 | 2,2 | |
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | dobré | 2,2 | 1,7 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,2 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
