Segment
1. Uniroyal RainMax 3 VAN Upper-middle2. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Conveo Tour 2 vs. Uniroyal RainMax 3 VAN
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Uniroyal). Uniroyal is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Uniroyal (63%). But when it comes to comparing Fulda Conveo Tour 2 and Uniroyal RainMax 3 VAN, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Conveo Tour 2 and the RainMax 3 VAN were tested.
| # | Fulda Conveo Tour 2
| Uniroyal RainMax 3 VAN
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,0 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 1,9 | |
| Uniroyal RainMax 3 VAN Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 4,6 | 3,4 | 3,1 | 1,5 | 1,9 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
