Segment
1. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Lowcost2. Sava Trenta 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Conveo Tour 2 vs. Sava Trenta 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Sava (67%). But when it comes to comparing Fulda Conveo Tour 2 and Sava Trenta 2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Conveo Tour 2 and the Trenta 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 53% of Fulda Conveo Tour 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (50%) of the Sava Trenta 2 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Fulda Conveo Tour 2
| Sava Trenta 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R15 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Sava Trenta 2 13.
Worst position in test
2. Sava Trenta 2 13.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | |
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,0 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 1,9 | |
| Sava Trenta 2 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,0 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 2,1 | |
| Show test details | |||||||