Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Barum (61%). The first tyre test of Firestone Winterhawk 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Barum Polaris 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the Winterhawk 3 and the Polaris 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Barum Polaris 5 also have C wet ratings.
# | Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Barum Polaris 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
1. Barum Polaris 5 14.82
1. Barum Polaris 5 Good2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended2. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 30,3 | ||||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 37,9 | ||||||
Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 34,3 | 25,5 | |||||
Barum Polaris 5 | 33,9 | 25 | |||||
Show test details |