Segment
1. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 2 Upper-middle
# | Firestone Multiseason 2
| Kleber Quadraxer 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In this review, we compare two popular tyre models: the Firestone Multiseason 2 and the Kleber Quadraxer 2, focusing on their test results, strengths, and weaknesses. This will help you make an informed decision when choosing the best tyre for your vehicle.
The Firestone Multiseason 2 tyre is a winter tyre with a rating of 79%, manufactured in Italy. It has excellent price/value ratio, snow traction, and dynamic wet handling. Its main weaknesses are moderate safety reserves when it comes to aquaplaning situations. The tyre has not been replaced by a newer model and remains a solid choice for drivers seeking good performance in winter conditions.
On the other hand, the Kleber Quadraxer 2 is an all-round tyre with a lower rating of 61%. This tyre has since been replaced by the Kleber Quadraxer 3. Its strengths lie in its exterior noise, snow braking, snow cornering, snow handling, and snow traction. Its main weakness is limited reserves when it comes to curve aquaplaning situations. Despite its lower rating, it remains a good option for those looking for a more economical tyre that provides decent performance in various conditions.
In the Autobild 2020 comparison test, out of 32 tyres, the Firestone Multiseason 2 secured the 6th position, while the Kleber Quadraxer 2 came in 14th. This indicates that the Firestone Multiseason 2 had overall better performance in the test, while the Kleber Quadraxer 2 offered some advantages in specific areas such as noise and snow performance.
To summarize, the Firestone Multiseason 2 stands out for its good traction and short braking distances on snow, dynamic wet handling, and high mileage. Its main weaknesses are its moderate safety reserves in aquaplaning situations. In contrast, the Kleber Quadraxer 2 offers excellent performance on compacted snow, short dry braking distances, low noise levels, good mileage, and affordability, but suffers from limited curve aquaplaning reserves.
When choosing between these two tyre models, consider your driving habits and environmental conditions. If you often drive in snowy or wet areas, the Firestone Multiseason 2 might be the better option for its superior performance in these conditions. However, if you are looking for a more affordable all-round tyre with decent performance in various scenarios, the Kleber Quadraxer 2 may be a suitable choice. Always remember to prioritize safety and consult with a tyre professional when making your decision.
For more information, feel free to visit the Firestone Multiseason 2 and Kleber Quadraxer 2 product pages, as well as the respective websites of their manufacturers: Firestone and Kleber.
1. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 2 Upper-middle
2. Kleber Quadraxer 2 12.63
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
Firestone Multiseason 2 | 42,4 | 54,1 | |||||
Kleber Quadraxer 2 | 42,6 | 55,8 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
Kleber Quadraxer 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 1 | 2+ | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
Firestone Multiseason 2 | 41,2 | 49,3 | |||||
Kleber Quadraxer 2 | 43,2 | 51,2 | |||||
Show test details |