Segment
1. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
Table of contents:
| # | Firestone Multiseason 2
| BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Comparing the Firestone Multiseason 2 and the BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2, it is clear that both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses. However, they differ significantly in their performance and ratings in various tests.
The Firestone Multiseason 2, manufactured in Italy, is described as a winter tyre, with a rating of 67% on our website. Some of its best features are its price-to-value ratio and snow traction. In the Autobild test, it ranked 6th out of 32 tyres. The testing data highlights its good traction and short braking distances on snow, dynamic wet handling, and short dry braking distances. It also boasts high mileage and offers excellent value for money. However, its main drawback is moderate safety reserves when aquaplaning. As of now, there has been no newer model to replace the Firestone Multiseason 2.
On the other hand, the BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2, an all-round tyre, has a rating of 48% on our site. Its best features include exterior noise, comfort, snow braking, snow cornering, and snow handling. Despite these features, it ranked 12th in the Autobild test. According to test data, this tyre excels as a snow tyre offering excellent side guidance and high traction on ice and snow, short dry braking distances, good rolling comfort, and fuel-saving rolling resistance. However, its primary concern was the understeering handling behavior on wet tracks. Similar to the Firestone model, there is no newer tyre yet to replace the BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2.
In direct comparison, the Firestone Multiseason 2 outperformed the BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 overall. However, the BFGoodrich tyre demonstrated superiority in aspects such as comfort and exterior noise, indicating it may be a superior choice for drivers preferring these qualities.
Both Firestone and BFGoodrich have a strong reputation in the tyre manufacturing industry and both of these tyres reflect the brands' dedication to providing quality products. However, the decision to pick one over the other will largely depend on each driver's individual preferences and driving conditions.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 42,4 | 54,1 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 | 42 | 55,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
| BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Firestone Multiseason 2 | 41,2 | 49,3 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-Grip All Season 2 | 43,1 | 51 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
