Segment
1. Firestone Destination Winter Upper-middle2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Firestone (65%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Destination Winter and the Eskimo HP2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Firestone Destination Winter has B wet grip rating, whereas 57% of Sava Eskimo HP2 has C rating.
# | Firestone Destination Winter
| Sava Eskimo HP2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R18 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Firestone Destination Winter Upper-middle2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 14.31
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Firestone Destination Winter Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Firestone Destination Winter Satisfactory
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
Firestone Destination Winter Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3,5 | 3,2 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 3,6 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
Show test details |